|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers #1017070 added September 9, 2021 at 12:03am
Restrictions: None
Fight The Power
Here's an article from 2017, but one that seems more relevant now than in the Before Time.
Normally, I'd link to the original source, but it's paywalled. This is a reprint.
Stupid people, Carlo M. Cipolla explained, share several identifying traits: they are abundant, they are irrational, and they cause problems for others without apparent benefit to themselves, thereby lowering society’s total well-being.
I would be remiss if I didn't note that intelligence isn't the last word on human worth. Half the world's human population possesses below-average intelligence (more or less), and it's possible to be stupid and nice, just as it's possible to be smart and an asshole. A university professor like Cipolla might have had some bias in the matter, though.
The only way a society can avoid being crushed by the burden of its idiots is if the non-stupid work even harder to offset the losses of their stupid brethren.
Wait, you want me to be smart and work hard? Let's not go too far, okay?
Of course, everyone does stupid things from time to time. I think it's a matter of proportion.
Let’s take a look at Cipolla’s five basic laws of human stupidity:
Oh, good. Having "The Five Universal Laws" in the headline and not stating them in the body would be... well... stupid.
Law 1: Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
No matter how many idiots you suspect yourself surrounded by, Cipolla wrote, you are invariably lowballing the total.
Yeah, best to assume everyone's an idiot until they show otherwise, and then still be prepared to revise one's opinion of them upon further observation.
But like I said... it's about half the population (depending on what's meant by "average").
Law 2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
Cipolla posits stupidity is a variable that remains constant across all populations. Every category one can imagine—gender, race, nationality, education level, income—possesses a fixed percentage of stupid people.
This may seem counterintuitive. Okay, it does seem counterintuitive. But the whole purpose of reasoning, and of science, is to check our intuition, which is usually less reliable than logic.
Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
Cipolla called this one the Golden Law of stupidity. A stupid person, according to the economist, is one who causes problems for others without any clear benefit to himself.
I'm just going to come right out and say it: anyone who trusts horse dewormer over a proven (yes, proven) preventative vaccine is, beyond any shadow of a doubt, in this group.
But to me, the important thing to know is the spectrum this economics professor proposed to map humanity:
This law also introduces three other phenotypes that Cipolla says co-exist alongside stupidity. First there is the intelligent person, whose actions benefit both himself and others. Then there is the bandit, who benefits himself at others’ expense. And lastly there is the helpless person, whose actions enrich others at his own expense.
You'll have to click on the link to see the graphic.
Law 4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.
We underestimate the stupid, and we do so at our own peril.
There's a quote attributed to Robert A. Heinlein that's relevant and I've kept it in mind for lo these many years: "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."
Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.
If "stupid" is defined as above, then yeah, I can believe that.
Declining societies have the same percentage of stupid people as successful ones. But they also have high percentages of helpless people and, Cipolla writes, “an alarming proliferation of the bandits with overtones of stupidity.”
“Such change in the composition of the non-stupid population inevitably strengthens the destructive power of the [stupid] fraction and makes decline a certainty,” Cipolla concludes. “And the country goes to Hell.”
So, based on this, the only way to keep the stupid in check is to actively increase one's position on the article's graph, up and to the right. Can it be done? I don't know. I'm too lazy to try, which I guess puts me in the "stupid" quadrant.
I think it takes an economics professor to think of things in this way. I have to wonder what his thoughts on Rational Market Theory  were, considering the percentage of people who act irrationally. It was in vogue around the time he wrote the above. But I can't be arsed to look it up. |
© Copyright 2021 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
