|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers #1019101 added October 11, 2021 at 12:08am
Restrictions: None
Bubble Rap
Well, yesterday's entry was about hamburgers (mini-contest results below). So it's only fitting - though random - that today's is about beer.
This gives me a chance to trot out one of my favorite words again: zythology. While the article focuses on effervescence, that's part of what makes beer great.
Beer is one of the oldest drinks that humans have made.
Praise Ninkasi!
And in a recent study, a pair of scientists from the Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne...
They weren't kicked out for studying la bière instead of le champagne? (To be fair, probably to avoid losing whatever passes for tenure in les universités françaises, the article goes on to note that they also studied this in champagne. I also love wine, sparkling or otherwise.)
...have drawn attention to a dazzling event that occurs every time we pour a cold one in a glass, by focusing on a key ingredient, carbon dioxide (CO2).
I was going to quibble over the use of the word "ingredient" there. When magic yeast eat sugar, they piss ethanol and fart carbon dioxide. So it's not an ingredient in the sense of "additive," not like the classic water-malt-hops-yeast; it's more of a byproduct. Well, like I said, I was going to quibble until I remembered that a lot of breweries enhance their products via carbonation, much as soft drink manufacturers do, so I guess it really is an ingredient and I'm glad I thought about it before I got pedantic.
By the way, one of the things that stuck with my from my background in chemistry is a weird thing about dissolved gas in a liquid. Most people are aware that heating a liquid usually increases the solubility of solid ingredients. For example, if you're making simple syrup for cocktails, you need to heat the water so the sugar will fully dissolve. When it cools down again, it usually stays in solution; this is called "supersaturation." Well, it's the opposite for most gases: the colder the water, the more dissolved gas it can hold. This is one reason why you want to open warm beers very, very carefully (if at all; warm beer sucks, though some are best at cellar temperature).
Beer is a liquid supersaturated with carbon dioxide gas. While contained in a sealed bottle, a high pressure keeps CO2 dissolved in the liquid in a larger amount than would normally exist at atmospheric pressure. But when the bottle is opened, CO2 quickly escapes into the air producing a wave of bubbles and foam.
This is also why you don't shake carbonated beverages. One TV/movie trope I absolutely despise is the one where they're celebrating, so they shake the fuck out of a bottle of champagne before opening it, causing a fire hydrant spray of foam. This is an atrocity, a blasphemous practice that is disrespectful to the manufacturer and, worse, to the beverage itself.
The scientists compared bubbling in beer with the same feature of champagne. They found that pouring a chilled Heineken over a tilted glass produced about 1.5 million bubbles – not very different from champagne, which produced slightly over 1 million bubbles.
Right now you may be wondering, "why does sparkling wine, including champagne, have bubbles while regular wine doesn't?" I dunno, and I can't be arsed to look it up. I imagine it has something to do with the strain of yeast involved.
However, the number of bubbles produced was dependent on the size of microcrevices in the glass. Microcrevices are sites on the surface of a glass wall that are only visible with a microscope, and they are where bubbles originate. They can span from 1 to 10 micrometers in size, roughly as small as a grain of sand.
This is misleading. The 1 to 10 micrometer range might overlap with the size of sand grains (whose definition is, as I noted in a previous entry, entirely arbitrary), but not according to the sources I found. Look at it this way: We can see down to about 0.1 mm  . Most of us can distinguish individual grains of sand, so they're generally bigger than 0.1mm. One micrometer is 0.001 mm - two orders of magnitude smaller. So something's off here. (We also usually can't see microcrevices because, duh, they're "micro.")
Another key finding was that champagne contained about five times more dissolved CO2 than beer. And surprisingly, the amount of CO2 dissolved in beer was only a little over that of carbonated water. In addition, beer bubbles were smaller than champagne bubbles and move through the drink differently. Smaller bubbles are preferred in champagne, according to Liger-Belair, “Mainly because small ascending bubbles rise more slowly which is more elegant.”
Oooh, elegant. Screw elegance; I just want a fine-tasting fermented beverage.
But yeah, effervescence is one factor that goes into my enjoyment of a beer. Different beers have different bubble profiles. There's a Belgian beer I know that forms a thick, foamy head that lingers. Other beers lose foam quickly, but keep the effervescence. Some beers don't ship well, and the bar will infuse it with nitrogen right there at the tap; this is usually done for darker beers, and the resulting cascade of minute foamy bubbles is an integral part of the experience. You can watch them rise to the top in waves. This is especially fascinating after you've already had a few. It does alter the taste, though, making a beer more creamy. I like it, but some people prefer the larger bubbles from CO2.
Mini-Contest Results!
You know, sometimes I don't think my cunning plans all the way through. I have a routine medical procedure scheduled for this week, one that requires me to follow a certain diet for a few days. You know what I can't have on this diet? Raw vegetables. And a lot of cooked ones, like onions. Which makes most of the mouth-watering burger recipes the Forbidden Fruit, at least until Thursday evening. So why did I ask for hamburger recipes? Like I said, sometimes I don't think my cunning plans all the way through. Damn, I'm craving a burger. Sure, I could eat just cooked ground beef on a roll, even with cheese, but that's not going to cut it right now.
I loved all the various burger descriptions and recipes. Some of them are more appealing to me, personally, than others are, but I could tell that you all loved what you were writing about, and that's cool. You all made it tough to pick just one, but for today I'm going to go with ForeverDreamer  for his awesomely described ideal burger, even though I'm not a fan of ramps (I did say I wasn't going to necessarily pick one I'd personally like). But all y'all gave me some good ideas and different perspectives on the culinary wonder that is the Hamburger.
And made me very, very hungry.
I like mine with lettuce and tomato
Heinz 57 and french fried potatoes
Big kosher pickle and a cold draft beer
Well, good God almighty which way do I steer
|
© Copyright 2021 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
