|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers #1023564 added December 23, 2021 at 12:02am
Restrictions: None
Something New Under the Sun
Warning: today's link is a slideshow. I tried some usual tricks for unsliding it, but I think they're on to my attempts to deprive them of precious clicks, and I can't be arsed to figure out any new method tonight.
As such, I normally wouldn't share something like this, but in this case, the combination of "hope" and "future" made me laugh, so here are some excerpts along with my snark.
mRNA Vaccines and the end of disease
If there’s a silver lining to the global pandemic, it’s the speed of the vaccine roll-out. Spurred by massive amounts of public cash and backed by decades of research, Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine was the first “Messenger RNA” medicine to be fully approved by the FDA. It’s unlikely to be the last.
...and half the population won't trust them.
Self-driving cars
Widespread adoption of self-driving cars is taking longer than was initially predicted, but once the technology is locked down and the public is comfortable with robot-driving, everything will change for the better.
Hahahaha.
Oh wait, you're serious.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Look, I'm a big proponent of autonomous vehicles. As far as I'm concerned, they can't roll out fast enough (and this is coming from someone who loves to drive). Mainly so I can get home from bars, but also, incidentally, because they will be safer.
Yes. They will. Stop laughing; that's my job. Oh, sure, you've heard the stories of test vehicles crashing or hitting people. Those only stand out because it's new technology. Every year in the US, something like 40,000 people die as a result of meat-driven vehicles. Imagine if every single one of them were reported on the way a single AV mishap is.
Would AVs reduce fatalities to zero? No. Nothing can make it perfectly safe. But as far as I'm concerned, if the fatality rate (and, in general, injury rate) could be reduced by a standard deviation or two, it's worth adopting. But no, people focus on the "it kills people!" part without considering that the current system kills people and we just accept it as the cost of doing business. What we need to focus on is "it will kill fewer people."
Also remember that there are a lot of individuals and groups that make money from the current system. Not just car companies, who could probably retool, and not just professional drivers, but municipalities who get their revenue from speeding tickets. That revenue would dry right up like the Mojave after a drizzle. They have a vested interest in promoting the "It's not safe!" propaganda.
Point, and the reason I laughed above, is that because of these and a myriad other factors (including loss of the illusion of being in control), "the public" won't ever be comfortable around robot drivers. Half the holdouts will be afraid of handing decisions over to an AI, and the other half will be afraid the AI will take over the world and enslave humanity. So no, I'll have to plan on staggering home from bars until the day I die (probably from being hit by a drunk driver).
Just so you know, I had a lot more written in this section, but I deleted it. I have a lot to say about it, which is one sign that I need to shut up about it. So this is me shutting up now.
De-extinction
Living robots
Advances in genetic engineering are getting us ever closer to saving endangered animal species from extinction and even bringing extinct species back to life.
Scientists at Tufts university have created living robots.
Science fiction and horror movies and books ought to be required reading/viewing for anyone going into science, especially bioscience and robotics.
Full body haptic suits
The idea of a full body suit that allows users to experience the feeling of a virtual or augmented space along with its sights and sounds is a little creepy. It’s like the background material in a dystopian science fiction movie or something.
So is everything else on this list.
In any case, of all the ones I'm highlighting, this is the one that I could see becoming reality. Because sex.
Carbon vodka and garbage sunglasses
The Air Company markets a Vodka they say they is made from carbon dioxide, so you can get drunk and eliminate carbon from the atmosphere at the same time.
How about some advances in editing technology while we're at it? "they say they is made," indeed. Feh.
Regardless, all vodka is made from carbon dioxide. Because it's made from plants. And plants sequester carbon. They turn the carbon into starches and/or sugars, which yeast then turns into magic fluid.
I can't be arsed to find out if this company's process is somehow more efficient or environmentally friendlier.
Anyway, I don't mean to be negative about scientific advances. Of course I'm excited about real progress. Let's just remember that almost no invention comes without a cost of some sort, sometimes one that only becomes obvious after the fact. The only question is whether the benefits outweigh the costs. So no, none of these make me hopeful about the future. That would require us having done something about climate change 30 years ago, not now that it's too late. |
© Copyright 2021 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
