|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers #1053028 added July 25, 2023 at 9:15am
Restrictions: None
Á La Mode
It's unlikely that any individual is "an average human." To claim so would be mean.
Pun intended, of course, if a bit forced.
While each of us has a decent conception of how we spend our own time, the actions of our fellow humans — from our next-door neighbors to people living in faraway countries — can seem quite mysterious. Do they watch as much TV? Work as many hours? Fiddle with their smartphones as frequently? Cook as often? Spend as much time watching their kids?
Even some of those questions reveal a developed-world bias.
First and foremost, the average human spends about 9.1 hours sleeping or resting.
As the article notes, "human" includes everyone, including children. I usually manage something like that, but certainly did not when I was working full-time.
While awake, the average person spends close to one-third of their day on passive, interactive, and social activities. These roughly 4.6 hours include reading, watching TV, making art, playing games, going to gatherings with friends or family, or simply doing nothing at all.
The idea of "simply doing nothing at all" seems incomprehensible to most Americans.
Eating and food preparation accounts for another 2.5 hours.
Yes, fast food isn't universally available.
Hygiene, including grooming, washing, and dressing, takes about 1.1 hours.
Oh, that's what I'm missing.
Cleaning and maintaining the spaces we inhabit costs us 0.8 hours of the day.
And that.
Though employment can be hugely time-consuming for working individuals, when looked at through the lens of the global human day, it appears as a mere sliver of time, just 2.6 hours.
Coincidentally, that's about how much actual productive time most office drones achieve.
Education also isn’t very demanding, only 1.1 hours.
That's because a whole lot of 0s skew the average.
The researchers were also curious about how average human time use changes with wealth.
One big advantage of being rich is grasping more leisure time by paying others to have more working time. For instance, I (not really rich for an American, but close enough) pay people to mow my lawn. To be clear, though, it used to take me about 4 hours to do it, while they knock it out in 15 minutes.
Additionally, people in the richest countries spend an average of just five minutes a day growing and harvesting food, while people in the poorest countries spend well over an hour doing so.
As this illustrates, you do, too, if you go shopping at a grocery store instead of growing your own food and butchering your own hogs.
By assembling the human chronome, the researchers say that we can compare ourselves to civilizations from the past.
Right, because we know exactly how they used all of their days. Also, civilization itself changes its individuals' time utilization.
More importantly, we can see from a high-level, empirical perspective what our species is doing on our planet and make more informed decisions about reallocating our collective time to change the world and society for the better.
Like that's going to happen. Also, the worst excesses are perpetrated by a very small, average-skewing group with greater resources (aka "the Rich").
So, while this research may be useful (no such thing as useless knowledge), I don't think it has the lofty practical potential that they claim. Not to mention that just looking at an "average" (however that's computed) tells you enough about the range. It's just another way of manipulating with statistics. For example, "the average human" possesses fewer than 2 legs. Think about it, and you'll realize I'm right. But saying that can be misleading, as the vast majority of people have exactly 2 legs.
Like me! I always knew I was above average at something. |
© Copyright 2023 Waltz Invictus (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Waltz Invictus has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
