|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers #482387 added January 19, 2007 at 1:59pm
Restrictions: None
Commentary
Okay, folks, no squicky or gross links today, I promise. Though the links I do provide might make you angry.
I thought I'd take a few moments to address some of the comments from yesterday's controversial entry:
darkin: You know, Robert, I could have gone my entire life without reading that first article! MY ENTIRE LIFE!!!!
Well, darkin, I know how much you care about others, and you wouldn't have wanted me to suffer the misery of reading that article all by myself, would you? You were just being your usual altruistic, unselfish self. I'll be glad to continue to help you help others 
Kenzie  : Yikes. I think you've managed to make this optimistic person think unkindly about mankind. That's not an easy task.
My work here is done.
Nada  : Turning green here....gawd, thanks soooo much for sharing. I don't think I could have even put that into my Sunday Funnies it was so gross. If you promise not to share that kind of stuff I'll come back.
I promise not to share that kind of stuff... today. Realistically, probably not again for a while. I tend to think this was a one of a kind sort of experience
dragonfly~guess who's back? : Wow--that was pretty icky. kudos to you, sir, for providing us all with our icky qouta for the week.
I have to add, that as I've read more of the previous blog entries, you have gained a new reader!
Translation: "I'd love to see this sort of thing about once a week, and your other blog entries have been much, much better."  Seriously, thanks for reading!
elusive ennui warm inside : yes... well did they ever ask if he'd eaten any of it? never eat anything the cook wouldn't eat...
And never eat anything with the word "Surprise" in the name.
Mavis Moog The meatball thing is art. It's challenging a deep seated modern taboo.
I'm all for challenging taboos; just look at some of my writing. It's useful to me to consider three levels of action: thought, word and deed. When considering a taboo action, the first thing that happens is thought - even if, as occurs in some crimes of passion, that thought is short-lived. One of the great eye-opening moments of my life came when I finally realized that there are people - nay, entire religions full of people - who seem to take the thought as the deed. That is, some consider that to even think about, say, adultery is the same thing as doing it. This honestly never occurred to me, and I strongly suspect it is just another example of organized religion keeping people in line by making them believe they're Bad - because who can control their initial thoughts? If I convince you that purple elephants, for example, are unclean and that any association with purple elephants will condemn your soul to eternal torment, well, oops, too late, you've already imagined a purple elephant, haven't you? You're going to Hell unless you give me 10% of your pre-tax income from now on. I take PayPal.
ANYway, the point is that I am convinced that there is no harm in harboring thoughts involving taboo actions. There may be some implied harm when the thoughts go to the level of words - either spoken or written - depending on the context. For example, if someone says "I think pot should be legal," it's not the same thing as saying "I smoke pot." Further, the one does not imply the other, though the latter expression may lead impressionable people to break the law, to their detriment. The final level, deed, is where the real trouble comes in. Deeds have real effects on other people. Some of you may recall my distinction between reality and imagination: imagination affects only you; reality affects other people also.
That said, I will continue to challenge taboos in my writing. I'm still not eating meatballs.
Speaking of taboos, let's look for a moment at one taboo that really isn't, much, anymore, except, apparently, in North Dakota:
http://tinyurl.com/25z5uk
North Dakota is one of the few states that outlaws cohabitation, which is defined as a man and woman living together "openly and notoriously" as if they were married... It is listed as a sex crime in state law, alongside adultery and incest.
Okay, let me get this straight... You're a guy living in North Dakota with his girlfriend. They catch you and try you, and you're convicted of cohabitation. You get sent to jail for a month and get fined $1000. Okay, no biggie, lots of people have spent a month in jail and had to pay $1000 fines. But now you have to register as a sex offender, and for the rest of your life you have to have your name pop up on registries, never be able to adopt, live in restricted communities amongst real sex offenders like child molesters and rapists? What the fuck is wrong with people??!
"If we look at the research, social science evidence suggests that living together is not a good way to prepare for marriage, or to avoid divorce," Freier said. "Cohabitating is not positive for the family, and poses a special risk for women and children."
You mean like this happy family, here?:
http://tinyurl.com/34gq9m
Tigger thinks of Prancer : Anyway, I think I'm going to bring meatless balls to work for lunch today.
*covers self* Damn, Tigs, I knew you were a feminist; I just didn't know you were THAT militant!
novusfemina: As for a Robot that builds houses.. why didn't they make a robot that CLEANS houses first?
Because they're still working on getting the boobs to look realistic. Snoogans! |
© Copyright 2007 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved.
Robert Waltz has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work. |
