1.   Do you think there's a significant problem around WdC regarding Awardicons being given to undeserving items (for any reason)? (R)

2.   If you do think there's a problem with Awardicons being given to undeserving items, what is the main cause? (R)

3.   Are Awardicons an accurate measure of an item's quality? (R)

4.   How often do you read the inscription on an Awardicon? (R)

5.   Does seeing an Awardicon on an item impact your opinion of that item's quality? (R)

6.   Approximately how many total Awardicons have you given out since joining WdC? (R)

7.   Of that total, approximately how many Awardicons did you give independently and solely based on the quality of the item? (In other words, excluding those given as part of contest placement, prize packages, or "just because" awards... i.e. the ones where you found something and felt compelled to award it) (R)

8.   Have you ever given an Awardicon to an item, for any reason, that you didn't feel deserved it? (Including giving higher value Awardicons than you felt an item deserved as a result of a contest or prize package requirement.) (R)

9.   If you run a contest that includes Awardicon prizes, how often do you feel that entries deserve the Awardicon you're offering? (R)

10.   Do you feel that there's a value point at which Awardicons are more likely to indicate quality? (For example, when you see an Awardicon of a certain value and above, are you more likely to assume it's a meaningful award/quality item?) (R)

11.   If you answered yes to the above question, at what value do you start assuming the awardicon is meaningful and the item is of comparable quality?